[personal profile] metaparadox
NOTE: This is a repost of a piece I originally posted on Pillowfort, here.

I'm 17.

This is speculation, but based on her description of herself, she might have identified as an aromantic heterosexual had she had that terminology at the time. You might think this is probably a stretch, but read this excerpt first:

I hate the American dating. I'm not used to date boys. All of them are my friends and companions and eventually sexual partners. But I have never fallen in love or never thought that one can be 'my' boyfriend. Most of times they enjoy you as sexual object and don't even care of your deepest yourself. I really don't believe in love. The rightest and best form of love I have ever experienced with people, regardless of age and sex is a deep sincere mutual communication and understanding. Friendship.

Occasionally I do feel hurt when the boys I have relations with prefer other girls or start relations with other girls. This comes from the education and conditioning and inhibitions I have received. My relations with boys are free and I feel I am free but sometimes I feel my freedom causes loneliness. I'm sure I will mature and leave these stupid teenage feelings. And I really don't see any other way I could be. What do you think of men? Do you refuse men? I don't. Some of them I really can't stand, but some (I have found them only between radicals) are good friends. Since you can have many friends and you can enjoy sex with many people, you can have free relations with many men at the same time. Here is where my frustrations start. What do you think? Do you avoid relations with men? I know some WL avoid men and have homosexual relations, but I really don't feel any sexual attraction toward women. It is true that after relations with men I feel exploited, even if I do recognize that they didn't exploit me more than I did exploit them.

At this point I'm lost.

She explicitly says she has never fallen in love, doesn't believe in love, and that the best form of love she has ever experienced is friendship. She enjoys having sex with some of her male friends. She states she feels no sexual attraction to women.
 
So why write in to a specifically lesbian feminist publication. It could be due to her radical political views. She expresses frustration at there being no "WL" (women's liberation) where she lives, and talks about reading leftist magazines.

But I think there might be more to it than that. She expresses here that she's so interested in this newspaper that she wants to purchase the full run and is excited to read them.

not too happy. I want all the papers so far (1 volume) for the $2.75 and the new ones you can send me for the rest of the money. When it's finished let me know. I'm so excited I look forward to read them I would have so many things to ask you but I think I'll wait to read the papers.

Again, I might be reading into this, but I think this makes perfect sense. She expresses feeling lost regarding her sexuality. She's clearly still trying to figure herself out. She eagerly asked questions of the newspaper editors about sexuality in the women's liberation movement.
 
There's so much of an expectation that women love men romantically. In 1972, that the lack of that drive might make someone head to the only option conceivable at the time, that a lack of loving men meant that perhaps she might love women. Yet, she recognized that she wasn't sexually attracted to women and was fine with sex with men. But that pressure for romance in society is quite possibly what made her interested in seeking out a lesbian feminist newspaper, because where else could she go for information?

AIN'T I A WOMAN? IS A PUBLICATION REFLECTING ONLY THE OPINION AND STRUGGLE OF A SMALL COLLECTIVE OF RADICAL GAY WOMEN- NOT THE WHOLE GAY/WOMEN'S COMMUNITY IN IOWA CITY

It's stuff like this that makes it so obvious to me that aromantic people belong in the queer community. Their struggles aren't the same as people with other marginalized romantic orientations, but there's clear evidence that they are harmed by society's expectations for women to be romantic and to marry.
 
Citations:

"Dear Sisters: I Have Been Willing to Write to You for a Long Time but I Never Had the Money to Send for the Newspaper." Aint I A Woman?, 30 Mar. 1972, p. 2. Archives of Sexuality and Gender, link.gale.com/apps/doc/XNTJNH070996486/AHSI?u=nypl&sid= bookmark-AHSI&xid=aaf6c7de. Accessed 8 July 2021.

The last image is from the back cover of the newspaper.

Thanks to my friend Infinite Glitterfall, who made videos on Youtube and Tiktok about the original post. You can find those videos here and here.

Profile

metaparadox: Self Portrait (Default)
Olivia Montoya

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 10:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios